Predicting intraindividual changes in learning strategies

Socio-cognitive models of self-regulated learning (eg. Pintrich, 2000) emphasize contextualized nature of learning process, and within-person variation in learning processes, along with between-person variability in self-regulation. Previous studies about contextual nature of learning strategies hav...

Full description

Permalink: http://skupnikatalog.nsk.hr/Record/ffzg.KOHA-OAI-FFZG:310474/Details
Matična publikacija: Review of psychology
20 (2013), 1 ; str. 53-60
Glavni autori: Buško, Vesna (-), Mujagić, Amela (Author)
Vrsta građe: Članak
Jezik: eng
Online pristup: Elektronička verzija članka
LEADER 03102naa a22002897i 4500
003 HR-ZaFF
005 20170606164001.0
008 131105s2013 xx eng|d
999 |c 310474  |d 310472 
022 |a 1330-6812 
035 |a (CROSBI)649490 
040 |a HR-ZaFF  |b hrv  |c HR-ZaFF  |e ppiak 
100 1 |9 400  |a Buško, Vesna 
245 1 0 |a Predicting intraindividual changes in learning strategies:   |b the effects of previous achievement /  |c Vesna Buško, Amela Mujagić. 
246 3 |i Naslov na engleskom:  |a Predicting intraindividual changes in learning strategies: The effects of previous achievement. 
300 |f str. 
363 |i 2013 
520 3 |a Socio-cognitive models of self-regulated learning (eg. Pintrich, 2000) emphasize contextualized nature of learning process, and within-person variation in learning processes, along with between-person variability in self-regulation. Previous studies about contextual nature of learning strategies have moslty focused on the effects of different contextual factors on interindividual differences in learning strategies utilization. However, less attention was given to the question about contextual effects on within-person variability in learning strategies. In this paper, the following questions were explored: (a) whether students exhibit intraindividual variability in learning strategies between two measurement occasions, or not, and (b) to what degree the observed intraindividual variability in selected learning strategies between two learning episodes can be accounted for by achievement after the first learning episode. The research questions were analyzed under the methodological framework of the latent state-trait theory (Steyer, Ferring, & Schmitt, 1992). The sample consisted of 297 first year university students attending Introduction to Psychology course. Selected learning strategies (organization, elaboration, and critical reasoning) were measured by means of adapted version of the Inventar zur Erfassung von Lernstrategien im Studium (Wild i Schiefele, 1994). Participants filled in the questionnaire before the exams on two occasions with a 7-week time lag. Students’ scores on the first exam were obtained from the teacher’s record. Results provide the evidence that there are individual differences in students' changes in the frequency of use of learning strategies at the end of semester (compared to the midsemester). Also, students who scored higher at the first exam exhibited less intraindividual variability in learning strategies utilization. 
536 |a Projekt MZOS  |f 130-1301683-1402 
546 |a ENG 
690 |a 5.06 
693 |a learning strategies, self-regulated learning, contextual effects, intraindividual variability  |l hrv  |2 crosbi 
693 |a learning strategies, self-regulated learning, contextual effects, intraindividual variability  |l eng  |2 crosbi 
700 1 |a Mujagić, Amela  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Review of psychology  |x 1330-6812  |g 20 (2013), 1 ; str. 53-60  |w ffzg.(HR-ZaFF)238398 
856 4 |u http://hrcak.srce.hr/116340  |y Elektronička verzija članka 
942 |c CLA  |t 1.01  |u 2  |z Znanstveni