Illusion of linearity in area and volume problems: Do metacognitive and visual scaffolds help university students?

When solving geometry problems, students are prone to the illusion of linearity – a tendency to believe that when one side of a geometrical figure is increased or decreased by a factor k, its area and volume are also changed by that same factor. The aim of this study was to examine how different typ...

Full description

Permalink: http://skupnikatalog.nsk.hr/Record/ffzg.KOHA-OAI-FFZG:310111/Details
Matična publikacija: Review of psychology
19 (2012), 2 ; str. 141-146
Glavni autori: Pavlin-Bernardić, Nina (-), Mateša, Barbara (Author)
Vrsta građe: Članak
Jezik: eng
Online pristup: Elektronička verzija članka
LEADER 02637naa a2200277uu 4500
005 20150618130403.0
008 131105s2012 xx eng|d
022 |a 1330-6812 
035 |a (CROSBI)625192 
040 |a HR-ZaFF  |b hrv  |c HR-ZaFF  |e ppiak 
100 1 |9 753  |a Pavlin-Bernardić, Nina 
245 1 0 |a Illusion of linearity in area and volume problems: Do metacognitive and visual scaffolds help university students? /  |c Pavlin-Bernardić, Nina ; Mateša, Barbara. 
246 3 |i Naslov na engleskom:  |a Illusion of linearity in area and volume problems: Do metacognitive and visual scaffolds help university students? 
300 |a 141-146  |f str. 
363 |a 19  |b 2  |i 2012 
520 |a When solving geometry problems, students are prone to the illusion of linearity – a tendency to believe that when one side of a geometrical figure is increased or decreased by a factor k, its area and volume are also changed by that same factor. The aim of this study was to examine how different types of help provided to university students influence their achievement in mathematical problems involving the enlargement or reduction of geometrical figures. The participants, 122 undergraduate psychology students, were divided into four groups. One group solved introductory task with visual scaffolds (help in the form of illustrations), second group received metacognitive scaffolds (help intended to provoke a cognitive conflict), third group received a combination of these, while the fourth group was a control group. All of the groups then solved the list of area, volume and linear problems. The results show that metacognitive and visual scaffolds enhanced students' performance in volume and area problems. There were no differences in the achievement between the experimental groups. The students in all experimental groups were better in solving area problems than volume problems, while there were no differences in the control group between the achievement in these two types of problems. 
536 |a Projekt MZOS  |f 130-1301676-1357 
546 |a ENG 
690 |a 5.06 
693 |a illusion of linearity, area problems, volume problems, metacognitive scaffolds, visual scaffolds  |l hrv  |2 crosbi 
693 |a illusion of linearity, area problems, volume problems, metacognitive scaffolds, visual scaffolds  |l eng  |2 crosbi 
700 1 |a Mateša, Barbara  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Review of psychology  |x 1330-6812  |g 19 (2012), 2 ; str. 141-146  |w ffzg.(HR-ZaFF)238398 
856 4 |u http://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=147850  |y Elektronička verzija članka 
942 |c CLA  |t 1.01  |u 2  |z Znanstveni - clanak 
999 |c 310111  |d 310109