Bordering on history : rewinding in past in Don DeLillo's Underworld

Don DeLillo’s novel Underworld presents the reader with a variety of transgressions of the text-context and fact-fiction boundaries, foregrounding the mechanisms of constructing both the past and the present reality and exposing the problem of fictional referentiality. Its two basic moves are the na...

Full description

Permalink: http://skupnikatalog.nsk.hr/Record/ffzg.KOHA-OAI-FFZG:313839/Details
Matična publikacija: European journal for semiotic studies
Graz : University of Graz, with the Austrian Association for Semiotics , 2000.
Glavni autor: Brlek, Tomislav (-)
Vrsta građe: Članak
Jezik: eng
LEADER 01837naa a2200205uu 4500
005 20141211144543.0
008 131111s2000 xx 1 eng|d
035 |a (CROSBI)63927 
040 |a HR-ZaFF  |b hrv  |c HR-ZaFF  |e ppiak 
100 1 |a Brlek, Tomislav  |9 678 
245 1 0 |a Bordering on history : rewinding in past in Don DeLillo's Underworld /  |c Brlek, Tomislav. 
773 0 |a Borders, Signs, Transitions; a colloquium in the series Open Borders (26-27.11.1999. ; Graz, Austrija)  |t European journal for semiotic studies  |d Graz : University of Graz, with the Austrian Association for Semiotics , 2000.  |g 12(2000), 2, 275-292  |w ffzg.(HR-ZaFF)238625  |x 1015-0102 
942 |c RZB 
246 3 |i Naslov na engleskom:  |a Bordering on History: Rewinding in Past in Don DeLillo's Underworld 
300 |a 275-292  |f str. 
520 |a Don DeLillo’s novel Underworld presents the reader with a variety of transgressions of the text-context and fact-fiction boundaries, foregrounding the mechanisms of constructing both the past and the present reality and exposing the problem of fictional referentiality. Its two basic moves are the narrative strategy of arranging groups of events in a chronologically reversed order, while simultaneously advancing the plot, and the procedure of invariably selecting the otherwise concealed, obscured, ignored or latent aspects of narrated events, whether fictional or historical. The resulting text – the fundamental aporia of its enterprise being emphasised by the novel’s ruling metaphor and intertextual signal: waste – could be read as taking its clue from Wittgenstein: The poet must always be asking himself: ‘is what I am writing really true then?’ – which does not necessarily mean: ‘is this how it happens in reality?’ 
536 |a Projekt MZOS  |f 130758 
546 |a ENG 
690 |a 6.03 
999 |c 313839  |d 313837