Erratum to "New discoveries and interpretations of hominid fossils and artifacts from Vindija Cave, Croatia" (J. Hum. Evol.46 (1) (2004) 27 - 67)
The authors regret that the Vindija Cave fossil specimen Vi 13.10 was misidentified as a hominid scapular fragment. Upon further analysis, it is clear that this specimen is most likely a fragment of carnivore ilium.
| Permalink: | http://skupnikatalog.nsk.hr/Record/ffzg.KOHA-OAI-FFZG:306293/Similar |
|---|---|
| Matična publikacija: |
Journal of human evolution 49 (2005), str. 781-782 |
| Glavni autori: | Ahern, James (-), Karavanić, Ivor (Author), Janković, Ivor Smith, Fred |
| Vrsta građe: | Članak |
| Jezik: | eng |
APA stil citiranja
Ahern, J. (2005). Erratum to "New discoveries and interpretations of hominid fossils and artifacts from Vindija Cave, Croatia" (J. Hum. Evol.46 (1) (2004) 27 - 67): Erratum to "New discoveries and interpretations of hominid fossils and artifacts from Vindija Cave, Croatia" (J. Hum. Evol.46 (1) (2004) 27 - 67). Journal of human evolution, p. 9.
Chicago stil citiranjaAhern, James. "Erratum to "New discoveries and interpretations of hominid fossils and artifacts from Vindija Cave, Croatia" (J. Hum. Evol.46 (1) (2004) 27 - 67): Erratum to "New discoveries and interpretations of hominid fossils and artifacts from Vindija Cave, Croatia" (J. Hum. Evol.46 (1) (2004) 27 - 67)." 2005: 9.
MLA stil citiranjaAhern, James. "Erratum to "New discoveries and interpretations of hominid fossils and artifacts from Vindija Cave, Croatia" (J. Hum. Evol.46 (1) (2004) 27 - 67): Erratum to "New discoveries and interpretations of hominid fossils and artifacts from Vindija Cave, Croatia" (J. Hum. Evol.46 (1) (2004) 27 - 67)." 2005: 9.