How general is general information construct?

There is a small number of constructs in the field of differential psychology that have raised so much debate between psychologists and professionals in related disciplines as is the case with general (verbal) information construct. It seemed reasonable to test the validity of this construct measure...

Full description

Permalink: http://skupnikatalog.nsk.hr/Record/ffzg.KOHA-OAI-FFZG:306287/Details
Matična publikacija: Psihološka obzorja : Horizons of psychology
14 (2005), 1 ; str. 9-17
Glavni autori: Zarevski, Predrag (-), Ivanec, Dragutin (Author), Zarevski, Zrinka
Vrsta građe: Članak
Jezik: eng
LEADER 02991naa a2200265uu 4500
008 131105s2005 xx eng|d
035 |a (CROSBI)209051 
040 |a HR-ZaFF  |b hrv  |c HR-ZaFF  |e ppiak 
100 1 |a Zarevski, Predrag  |9 1006 
245 1 0 |a How general is general information construct? /  |c Zarevski, Predrag ; Ivanec, Dragutin ; Zarevski, Zrinka. 
246 3 |i Naslov na engleskom:  |a How general is general information construct? 
300 |a 9-17  |f str. 
363 |a 14  |b 1  |i 2005 
520 |a There is a small number of constructs in the field of differential psychology that have raised so much debate between psychologists and professionals in related disciplines as is the case with general (verbal) information construct. It seemed reasonable to test the validity of this construct measured with general information test in comparison with other measures of knowledge (cultural knowledge, vocabulary, knowledge of the most recent events), foreign language knowledge and standard verbal type g test. A sample of 376 candidates for state services was tested in a selection situation. Three analyses were conducted to determine the position of general information test in the space of other verbal competency measures. First analysis questioned latent structure of the space of 4 tests having the same format and questioning the knowledge of international terms, general culture, knowledge of most recent events, and general information. The second analysis included the g-factor intelligence test so to see how the above described structure changes when this new test is introduced. Third analysis introduced an English language test. In all of the three component analyses only one Eigenvalue was larger than 1 and it explained between 52-64% of the variance. In all analyses general information test had the highest projection on the only significant latent dimension of these cognitive spaces. In other words, it can be concluded that general information knowledge is in the center of this hyperconus. That is why we consider measurement of general information knowledge, as well as the construct itself, to be an important question in psychology. Thus, a summarized answer to the question in the title of this paper is: go further with the investigation of this construct because it does not seem that it is named general information by chance. 
536 |a Projekt MZOS  |f 0130425 
536 |a Projekt MZOS  |f 0130475 
546 |a ENG 
690 |a 5.06 
693 |a individual idfferences, knowledge level, general information, validity, component analysis, general intelligence  |l hrv  |2 crosbi 
693 |a individual idfferences, knowledge level, general information, validity, component analysis, general intelligence  |l eng  |2 crosbi 
700 1 |a Ivanec, Dragutin  |4 aut  |9 403 
700 1 |a Zarevski, Zrinka  |4 aut 
773 0 |t Psihološka obzorja : Horizons of psychology  |x 1318-1874  |g 14 (2005), 1 ; str. 9-17 
942 |c CLA  |t 1.01  |u 2  |z Znanstveni - clanak 
999 |c 306287  |d 306285